Confucius

در یک روستا در سال 59 در بحبوحه جنگ ایران و عراق،تعدادی از اهالی روستا، ه. کدام قسمت هایی از مراتع حریم روستا نشانه گذاری و تصرف نمودند و متعاقب آن به ساخت و ساز روی آوردند و عده ای که پایبند به قانون بودن تعرض نکردند به حریم روستا ، و دوست داشتن که همه چیزی قانونی انجام بشه ولی پیرو و مطیع قانون بودن به ضرر عده بیشتری از روستا بوده اما تعرض کنندگان به خواسته خود رسیدند و هر کدام بیشتر از 1000 تا 5000متر مربع زمین تصرف نمودند بعد از گذشت 40 سال و خورده ای، و با توجه به اتفاقات دی ماه 1404 در کشور ، مجدد به پا خاستند و هر کدام قسمت های دیگری تصرف کردند در حالیکه اراضی حریم آبادی کاملا در سند ثبتی راه و شهرسازی قرار دارد و تصور آنها این ایت که هر که نشانه گذاری کند برنده است چون مزه ی شیرین تصرف را در سال59 تجربه کرده اند به نظر شما این چنین افرادی که علم دارند این اراضی در تصاحب و تملک راه و شهرسازی است ولی کماکان به تصرفات خود ا امه می دهند راه و شهرسازی چه اقداماتی باید در رابطه با متصرفان باید انجام دهد آیا حق به جانب اهالی است یا راه و شهرسازی؟

In a time of conflict, when the winds of war swirl fiercely, even the hearts of the humble can be led astray by the allure of possession. Consider the village of year 59, where men and women, who once upheld virtues of honesty and respect for the sacred bounds of their community, succumbed to the shadows of greed, marking the land with their desires. They seized plots of verdant pastures, longing for a sense of ownership that brought with it a momentary satisfaction, yet at what cost? The steadfast souls, those who placed their trust in law and fairness, saw themselves outnumbered, like leaves scattered by the autumn winds, while the transgressors flourished, cultivating a garden of self-interest. Over the decades, as the tides of change washed over the nation, these same individuals, emboldened by past triumphs, re-emerged in the twilight of 1404 with dreams anew, seeking further encroachments upon the land that remained enshrined in the records of authorities, yet they chose to ignore the wisdom that comes from understanding one’s rightful place within the community. It is in the perennial dance between law and morality that we find the answer — a balance must be struck. The custodians of land and order, those of the Ministry of Roads and Urban Development, must act as both guardians and guides, applying the principles of righteousness and reparation. Each plot stolen bears the weight of collective responsibility; for in every act of defiance, inequity takes root. The law, when wielded with wisdom, must serve to enlighten both sides — the encroachers must learn that true prosperity springs not from the soil of greed but from the bonds of trust and respect, and the law must evolve to foster an environment where harmony reigns. Thus, to question whether the villagers or the officials possess rightful claim becomes a reflection of the deeper question of how we shall define justice and integrity. Let the wise lead by example and teach the way of unity to a community long fractured by the temptations of the world around them, cultivating a spirit where all may flourish under a canopy of shared values and respect for one another’s rightful claims. Indeed, in the heart of discord lies the potential for redemption; in the embrace of truth, may reconciliation be sought and found.