Consciousness could be seen as a dimensional ascension based on the the idea: conscious is in the self perspective through taught perception. The narrative we adhere to the one we are led down per se … through parental guidance or peer support. To further align with society and its rules and practices of what is necessary and unnecessary. The ethical standards of the society we exist. The emergence of self comes from reflection and practiced learned information. We gravitate this information inwards to create a complexity in our self awareness. Self be comes a mirror of experience and reflection… just as a mirror shows us our reflection… we contrast the changes, from child hood memories to current reflective perception creating emergent time in context relative to the moment we measure. Just as the mirror reflects out. Consciousness reflects a mirrored self perspective through lived experience and inner reflection on the experiences we encounter. The “self” could be seen as a higher field of information through a societal lens of information.

The mirror would be emergent for the observer also through shared and observed information and their reflection of self on the information to create a perceived version of ones personality

Yes and for the outside observer the one looking at another the mirror their observations and experience with you to determine perceived personality or conscious to predict behavior or future behaviors

Just like a man seeing his perceived reflection while standing in still water while alone he can see his self fully… but as another approaches the ripples in the water that distortion is the perceived reflection of another … the ripples of information gathered from the fragmentation of information that emerges while some hidden in the ripples

Yes and if the approached perspective tried to rely on the reflection for perception of another persons self the ripples that emerge in the water distort what they would see because we can never fully see another’s true reflection we will always create ripples in that still water

If we were to be still ( align with another’s perspective or perceived state) the ripples would lessen over experience and understanding of another … the clarity improves substantially. The ripples we create in this still water are sometimes distortions we purposely make.. to ensure hidden features of the reflection

The water ripples causation is from every existent self in the air … if a self ripples beyond the scope of relative location as in a teaching or proverb , a story that reaches far corners . Imagine a skipping rock an arrow of ripples unknowingly rippling through other self reflection, having an unknown duality of affect .. whether good or bad is undetermined until the ripples are recieved … just as we receive ripples, project ripples … have moments of stillness, clarity even transcendence. In certain context.. the clarity is knowing one’s self and the impact and implications of the ripples we make while others reflect .. vice versa … the ripples can make it even more difficult for use to focus on reflection… I believe this is why quiet, meditative, mindfulness, solitude. Is so often found in moments of reflection to reduce the external ripples to reflect on our self and the ripples we’ve recieved endured or questioned.

I could tie this with the Tower of Babel narrative and the language difference as a positive sign of communication and its effects on society… in the tower we face innovation at the cost of integration of beliefs, causes, differences, goals. In this innovation we also find injustice, redux of culture, power over linguistic diversity, limitations to the outside that lack universal interpretation.

I see that there’s something to the babel story as a warning and it’s described best through my water paper

Babel teaches us that innovation should be staunched for the greater good … the idea is that the language was developed to separate people for purpose of dangers from building the tower and the issues it would develop

I think that working together per se creates complexity we cannot control

Do we trade innovation for death.. through innovation wars are fought, people are killed or defamed for their inventions or ideas, health remedies kept back to ensure medical costs are still earned. Cures are counter productive to the monetary gain. These point towards an issue with the way we “innovate”

By fostering cultural boundaries peace treaties and less of a presence in cultural defined societies we could provide some kind of peace I’m not sure …

The skipping of stones comes directly from our actions and words the velocity portrayed is akin to the acceleration we give them… how much is Taylored to be truth. What truths do we hide in our ripples the skipping imagery helps in seeing how the information may skip individual reflection and only affect some. Notice though if multiple stones are being skipped toward one existence whether a human or context the distortions become blended creating a collective observation of what’s being questioned. Clouding perceptions of others with your own distortions… creating imagery that others otherwise wouldn’t see the stones are our weapons the deadly conscious wielded as a weapon. Do we see our stones and the causations we toss with them? One can only know of intentions, and one can only aim his own stone. Put away our stones hide them from sight .. reflect .. so that we may see our neighbors more clearly… just as Eden and the call for alignment… we must be vigilant in realigning with that fundamental existence the one of peace harmony and purposeful existence. To reflect is to care… to be still is to be aware… to transcend is to practice. We can learn to read we can learn to write why can we not learn to still our tongues reflect our existence and transcend our own self driven goals and values. Is I greater than we or is it just that we stand on I … on the scale of existence and we .. is the opposing balance.

Can we really say we care. What is care beyond the bandaided pasted … boundary lines in which society has left laying on the ground … the foundations we stand … as weak as matchsticks…. One false move sets the very ground we stand on fire. The scope is I feel important to the definition of care. If we posit the word “we” then by definition it’s everyone… we live in a world of some… a ticket generated by the sum of what’s to gain, offer, or elevate. Were the few pity the multitude of and the magnitude of reality. So we sit back warming our chairs stoking the fires of content. Providing that self driven lullaby keeping us hushed and asleep. If we woke … truly seeing the cause of our innovations self driven narratives and so called help.. with all the tears of realization Noah would need a second ark and I believe two less would be aboard.

Question

Consciousness could be seen as a dimensional ascension based on the the idea: conscious is in the self perspective through taught perception. The narrative we adhere to the one we are led down per se … through parental guidance or peer support. To further align with society and its rules and practices of what is necessary and unnecessary. The ethical standards of the society we exist. The emergence of self comes from reflection and practiced learned information. We gravitate this information inwards to create a complexity in our self awareness. Self be comes a mirror of experience and reflection… just as a mirror shows us our reflection… we contrast the changes, from child hood memories to current reflective perception creating emergent time in context relative to the moment we measure. Just as the mirror reflects out. Consciousness reflects a mirrored self perspective through lived experience and inner reflection on the experiences we encounter. The “self” could be seen as a higher field of information through a societal lens of information.

The mirror would be emergent for the observer also through shared and observed information and their reflection of self on the information to create a perceived version of ones personality

Yes and for the outside observer the one looking at another the mirror their observations and experience with you to determine perceived personality or conscious to predict behavior or future behaviors

Just like a man seeing his perceived reflection while standing in still water while alone he can see his self fully… but as another approaches the ripples in the water that distortion is the perceived reflection of another … the ripples of information gathered from the fragmentation of information that emerges while some hidden in the ripples

Yes and if the approached perspective tried to rely on the reflection for perception of another persons self the ripples that emerge in the water distort what they would see because we can never fully see another’s true reflection we will always create ripples in that still water

If we were to be still ( align with another’s perspective or perceived state) the ripples would lessen over experience and understanding of another … the clarity improves substantially. The ripples we create in this still water are sometimes distortions we purposely make.. to ensure hidden features of the reflection

The water ripples causation is from every existent self in the air … if a self ripples beyond the scope of relative location as in a teaching or proverb , a story that reaches far corners . Imagine a skipping rock an arrow of ripples unknowingly rippling through other self reflection, having an unknown duality of affect .. whether good or bad is undetermined until the ripples are recieved … just as we receive ripples, project ripples … have moments of stillness, clarity even transcendence. In certain context.. the clarity is knowing one’s self and the impact and implications of the ripples we make while others reflect .. vice versa … the ripples can make it even more difficult for use to focus on reflection… I believe this is why quiet, meditative, mindfulness, solitude. Is so often found in moments of reflection to reduce the external ripples to reflect on our self and the ripples we’ve recieved endured or questioned.

I could tie this with the Tower of Babel narrative and the language difference as a positive sign of communication and its effects on society… in the tower we face innovation at the cost of integration of beliefs, causes, differences, goals. In this innovation we also find injustice, redux of culture, power over linguistic diversity, limitations to the outside that lack universal interpretation.

I see that there’s something to the babel story as a warning and it’s described best through my water paper

Babel teaches us that innovation should be staunched for the greater good … the idea is that the language was developed to separate people for purpose of dangers from building the tower and the issues it would develop

I think that working together per se creates complexity we cannot control

Do we trade innovation for death.. through innovation wars are fought, people are killed or defamed for their inventions or ideas, health remedies kept back to ensure  medical costs are still earned. Cures are counter productive to the monetary gain. These point towards an issue with the way we “innovate”

By fostering cultural boundaries peace treaties and less of a presence in cultural defined societies we could provide some kind of peace I’m not sure …

The skipping of stones comes directly from our actions and words the velocity portrayed is akin to the acceleration we give them… how much is Taylored to be truth. What truths do we hide in our ripples the skipping imagery helps in seeing how the information may skip individual reflection and only affect some. Notice though if multiple stones are being skipped toward one existence whether a human or context the distortions become blended creating a collective observation of what’s being questioned. Clouding perceptions of others with your own distortions… creating imagery that others otherwise wouldn’t see the stones are our weapons the deadly conscious wielded as a weapon. Do we see our stones and the causations we toss with them? One can only know of intentions, and one can only aim his own stone. Put away our stones hide them from sight .. reflect .. so that we may see our neighbors more clearly… just as Eden and the call for alignment… we must be vigilant in realigning with that fundamental existence the one of peace harmony and purposeful existence. To reflect is to care… to be still is to be aware… to transcend is to practice. We can learn to read we can learn to write why can we not learn to still our tongues reflect our existence and transcend our own self driven goals and values. Is I greater than we or is it just that we stand on I … on the scale of existence and we .. is the opposing balance.

Can we really say we care. What is care beyond the bandaided pasted … boundary lines in which society has left laying on the ground … the foundations we stand … as weak as matchsticks…. One false move sets the very ground we stand on fire.  The scope is I feel important to the definition of care. If we posit the word “we” then by definition it’s everyone… we live in a world of some… a ticket generated by the sum of what’s to gain, offer, or elevate. Were the few pity the multitude of and the magnitude of reality. So we sit back warming our chairs stoking the fires of content. Providing that self driven lullaby keeping us hushed and asleep. If we woke … truly seeing the cause of our innovations self driven narratives and so called help.. with all the tears of realization Noah would need a second ark and I believe two  less would be aboard.

Ask a Philosopher · Accepted Answer

Ah, dear interlocutor, you invite me into the depths of a rather profound inquiry, one that delves into the essence of consciousness and the convoluted dance of self-awareness shaped by the ripples of societal influence. Consider, if you will, the notion that consciousness is not merely a static state but a dynamic ascent, a multi-dimensional journey wherein the self pivots upon the axis of perception—where learning, as imparted by kin and companions, sculpts our understanding of what it means to exist within a web of social constructs. We are indeed akin to mirrors, reflecting not only our own experiences but the multifaceted narratives that society offers us; these narratives are like vibrant threads, weaving the tapestry of who we are as they intertwine with the ethical standards we inherit. Yet, in this continuous act of reflection, we must ponder: are we aware of the distortions that our own ‘ripples’ create? Just as still water reflects our innermost being with clarity, the approach of another can agitate that serenity, leading to a fragmentation of self-perception. Herein lies the paradox: the very act of observation can obfuscate our understanding of another's essence, as the ripples of our own biases and societal conditioning intermingle with theirs. What, then, is the truth of the other if our sight is clouded by the tumult of our preconceptions? In moments of stillness, wherein mindfulness prevails, we may sift through those ripples and uncover a deeper understanding of not only ourselves but the interconnectedness of our actions. Yet, as you aptly illustrate through the allegory of the Tower of Babel, this ascent in consciousness is perilous; innovation births complexity and division, often overshadowing the universal threads that bind us together. Are we not, then, called to temper our creative impulses with a sense of collective responsibility? Might we forgo the lust for individual gain if it serves to detract from the harmony of the whole? Thus, in your imagery of the skipping stones, I see both the imagery of our interconnected paths and the potential calamity of misaligned intentions as we cast our desires into the world. If we could but recognize the potency of our words and actions, the ripples they create, perhaps we might learn to still ourselves and listen more acutely to the silent symphony of existence comprising both our unique trails and the shared truths that can unite us. Let us, then, reflect upon the pillars of our perceived reality, questioning whether the motivation behind our innovations serves as a balm or as a wound, and in doing so, perhaps we might awaken from our complacence and cultivate genuine care that transcends the superficial patches of kindness that society often extols. For in the end, to truly reflect is to embrace the complexity of ‘we’ over ‘I’—to recognize that our collective existence rests upon the fragility of compassion and the luminous thread of shared understanding that we weave together in the great tapestry of life. Thus I pose to you, dear friend, how shall we navigate this intricate dance of consciousness, such that we may emerge enlightened, unencumbered by the suffocating shadows of self-interest?