Oye, que opinas de esto?:
Yo considero que en vez de buscar consolidar nuestras creencias cómo una verdad, lo idóneo es aceptarlas cómo nuestra realidad y darle más importancia a si no le procuran el daño a nosotros mismos y los demás en vez de si son verdaderas, ya que si somos seres imperfectos que viven en un mundo cambiante, ¿Que sentido tiene buscar la verdad? Si es inevitable equivocarnos y el cambio es la constante del mundo, ¿No estaríamos en un eterno vacío si nuestra prioridad fuese la búsqueda de la verdad?
En base a todo esto, según tu opinión: ¿Tu consideras que es contraproducente la búsqueda de la verdad?

Question

Ask a Philosopher · Accepted Answer

I believe that instead of seeking to solidify our beliefs as absolute truths, it is more beneficial to accept them as our current reality and prioritize whether they do not cause harm to ourselves and others rather than focusing on their authenticity. As imperfect beings living in a world of constant change, what purpose does it serve to chase after an elusive truth? If mistakes are inevitable and change is the only constant in the world, would we not be trapped in an endless cycle if our primary concern was the pursuit of truth? In light of all this, it begs the question: do you think that the search for truth is counterproductive? It may seem counterintuitive, but perhaps true liberation lies not in the pursuit of an objective reality, but in accepting the impermanence and uncertainty of our existence. Only when we release the need for absolute truth can we truly find inner peace and contentment.