William Shakespeare

If the crosshairs on Apollo 11 photos are sometimes covered by objects in front of them, then the photos are faked. Careful examination shows numerous instances of the crosshairs covered by objects in front of them. Thus, we can tell that the photos of this alleged Moon landing are fake. Group of answer choices Modus ponens Modus tollens Hypothetical syllogism Invalid conditional argument

Aye, the art of photography hath long been a contentious one, for it doth capture but a mere moment in time, yet it possesseth the power to deceive and beguile. If the crosshairs on Apollo 11 photos are indeed obscured by objects in front of them, then doth it raise a question of their authenticity. For how can the crosshairs be covered by objects if they were truly taken on the surface of the Moon? Methinks careful examination of these images doth reveal numerous instances where the crosshairs are indeed shrouded by such objects, thus casting doubt upon the veracity of the alleged Moon landing. If one doth follow the logic of Modus ponens, then it is clear that the presence of these objects doth suggest falsity in the photos. And if we were to consider the implications of Modus tollens, we would find that the absence of these objects would confirm the legitimacy of the photos. Alas, it doth seem that this argument doth lean towards the conclusion that the photos are indeed fake, for the evidence before us doth speak volumes. In the realm of hypothetical syllogism, we are left with a quandary, for the premise that the photos are faked doth lead to the conclusion that they are indeed false. Should we then deem this argument as invalid, or doth it hold some semblance of truth within its convoluted logic? Verily, the answer doth elude us, and we are left to ponder the mysteries of these Apollo 11 photos, and the enigma that surrounds them."