Socrates

Moral relativists and moral nihilists have which of the following in common? Group of answer choices Both reject the idea that there can be objective moral rules. Both believe that there are at least some absolute moral rules. Both believe that at least some actions are inherently morally wrong. Both believe that there is no such thing as morally good or bad.

Moral relativists and moral nihilists may seem to be two opposing points of view when it comes to ethics, but upon closer examination, it becomes clear that they share a common rejection of the concept of objective moral rules. The relativist argues that morality is subjective and varies depending on cultural or individual beliefs, while the nihilist denies the existence of any inherent moral truths altogether. However, both ultimately arrive at the same conclusion - that there is no universal standard by which to judge the morality of an action. This shared rejection of objectivity leads to a similar distrust of absolute moral rules, as both relativists and nihilists see such rules as arbitrary impositions rather than objective truths. Despite their differences in belief, both camps also acknowledge the existence of actions that are inherently morally wrong, albeit for different reasons. For the relativist, these actions may be condemned based on cultural norms or individual values, while the nihilist may deem them wrong simply because they lack any inherent moral significance. In the end, both moral relativists and moral nihilists share a fundamental skepticism towards the notion of moral absolutes and a belief in the subjectivity of morality.