Identify any rhetorical devices you find in the following selections, and classify those that fit the categories described in the text. For each, explain its function in the passage. I trust you have seen Janet’s file and have noticed the “university” she graduated from. The original goal of the Milosevic government in Belgrade was ethnic cleansing in Kosovo. Obamacare: The compassion of the IRS and the efficiency of the post office, all at Pentagon prices. Although it has always had a bad name in the United States, socialism is nothing more or less than democracy in the realm of economics. We’ll have to work harder to get Representative Burger reelected because of his little run-in with the law. page 177 It’s fair to say that, compared with most people his age, Mr. Beechler is pretty much bald. During World War II, the U.S. government resettled many people of Japanese ancestry in internment camps. “Overall, I think the gaming industry would be a good thing for our state.” —From a letter to the editor, Plains Weekly Record Capitalism, after all, is nothing more or less than freedom in the realm of economics. I’ll tell you what capitalism is: Capitalism is Charlie Manson sitting in Folsom Prison for all those murders and still making a bunch of bucks off T-shirts.

Question

Ask a Philosopher · Accepted Answer

In this realm of intellectual musings, where we delve into the depths of rhetoric and its cunning devices, I find myself pondering upon a selection of statements. Oh, how powerful these rhetorical devices can be, weaving their enchanting webs of persuasion and manipulation. Let us embark on this journey of identification and classification, forsooth!

In the first selection, we are confronted with an allusion to Janet's file, coupled with an emphasis on her university of graduation. Methinks this device beeth an appeal to ethos, to establish credibility and authority. By bringing forth this information, the speaker seeks to discredit Janet, as if her association with such an institution renders her unworthy. Verily, a fine example of the ad hominem fallacy.

Moving on to the pronouncement regarding the original goal of the Milosevic government in Belgrade, we find a striking instance of hyperbole, exaggerating the gravity of their intentions. The very term "ethnic cleansing" is drenched in emotion, encapsulating the cruelty and injustice of the act. It serves the purpose of evoking a strong emotional response in the audience, thus appealing to their pathos.

Ah, the mention of Obamacare, woven within a comparison of the compassionate IRS and the efficient post office, all at Pentagon prices. This, dear friends, is a splendid employment of irony. The speaker portrays the facets of Obamacare as desirable virtues, yet the comparison to the often criticized IRS and post office deftly mocks the true nature of the matter. Verily, an ironic twist that carries a touch of sarcasm.

The subsequent pronouncement extolling the virtues of socialism, likening it to democracy in the realm of economics, takes upon itself the rhetorical mantle of analogy. By drawing parallels between the two systems, the speaker seeks to present socialism as an inherently democratic concept, thus augmenting its appeal through the association with a well-regarded system of governance.

Lo and behold, we encounter the mention of Representative Burger, besmirched by a recent encounter with the law. In this case, the speaker employs the rhetorical device of euphemism, in an attempt to downplay the seriousness of the transgression. By referring to it as a "little run-in," the speaker seeks to soften the impact upon the audience's perception of Representative Burger, lessening the weight of his misdeed.

With page 177, we find an example of understatement, a rhetorical technique employed to portray the subject matter as less significant or extreme than it truly is. By stating that Mr. Beechler is "pretty much bald," the speaker downplays the extent of his baldness, thus creating a subtle effect of irony or humor.

Ah, the dark days of World War II come to light once more, as we encounter the mention of the U.S. government's internment camps for people of Japanese ancestry. Here we witness the use of euphemism once more, as the term "resettled" is employed to veil the reality of the situation. By couching the relocation in such terms, the speaker seeks to soften the audience's perception of the government's actions, avoiding the use of more explicit and damning descriptors.

As we approach the end of our journey, the statement regarding the gaming industry's impact on the state presents an instance of the rhetorical device known as a tautology. By repeating the sentiment that the gaming industry would be a good thing, the speaker seeks to strengthen and emphasize their opinion, leaving little room for doubt or debate.

Finally, we witness an impassioned declaration against capitalism, veiled within a comparison to Charlie Manson's exploits. Here we find the device of analogy once more, as the speaker seeks to equate capitalism with the heinous crimes of Manson. By juxtaposing these disparate entities, the speaker aims to create a sense of moral outrage and condemnation, thus appealing to the audience's sense of justice and righteousness.

Oh, how wondrous it is to grapple with these linguistic tools, these rhetorical devices that shape and mold our words. They serve as potent instruments in our attempts to persuade, to influence, and to captivate the minds of our listeners. Let us not underestimate their power nor dismiss their eloquence, for in the hands of a skilled rhetorician, they can produce effects that reverberate through the annals of history.