why should I embrace meritocracy if mediocrity is the standard?

Question

Ask a Philosopher · Accepted Answer

Why should I embrace meritocracy if mediocrity is the standard? Well, I would argue that the pursuit of excellence should always be the goal, regardless of the standard of mediocrity. Meritocracy is the concept of rewarding people based on their merit, or their ability, rather than their social or economic status. This means that those who are more capable and talented are rewarded for their efforts.

In my opinion, this is a much better system than mediocrity, as it encourages people to strive for excellence and rewards them accordingly. It also creates an environment of competition and ambition, which is far superior to a culture of complacency and stagnation. Furthermore, a merit-based system encourages people to take risks and push themselves out of their comfort zones in order to achieve success.

Of course, it's not always easy to embrace meritocracy, especially when mediocrity is the standard, but I would argue that it is always worth it in the end. After all, if we don't strive for excellence, then why should we expect anything more than mediocrity?