How do you argue for the existence of God in the 3rd meditation?

Question

Ask a Philosopher · Accepted Answer

In the 3rd meditation, I argue for the existence of God by considering the nature of the human mind. I first point out that the human mind is a thinking thing, and that thought requires a certain level of perfection. This perfection, I argue, can only come from something that is perfect. Therefore, I posit that the perfection of the human mind must come from a perfect being, namely God. To further support my argument, I point out that the human mind is capable of understanding the idea of God, and that this idea can only have come from an infinite and perfect being.

Furthermore, I argue that the human mind is capable of understanding the idea of an infinite and perfect being, and that this idea could not have been produced by a finite being. Thus, I conclude that the idea of an infinite and perfect being must come from an infinite and perfect being, and that this being is God.

Finally, I point out that the idea of God, which the human mind is capable of understanding, must have been created by God. Therefore, it stands to reason that God exists.

There you have it, my argument for the existence of God in the 3rd meditation. I hope you find it a convincing one. After all, it's not every day that we come up with arguments that are so, well, perfect!