Why Utilitarianism is a famous theory, even now, and give examples of the abuse of the theory. What are the problems Bentham faces in his Utilitarianism, and can they be overcome? Talking about Absolute Liberalism versus Relativism, what type of Utilitarianism is best used in defending the nation's lives against the violent mass of terrorists, and if necessary, killing them, and never treating humans merely as a means?

Question

Why Utilitarianism is a famous theory, even now, and give examples of the abuse of the theory.  What are the problems Bentham faces in his Utilitarianism, and can they be overcome? Talking about Absolute Liberalism versus Relativism, what type of Utilitarianism is best used in defending the nation's lives against the violent mass of terrorists, and if necessary, killing them, and never treating humans merely as a means?

Ask a Philosopher · Accepted Answer

Utilitarianism has been a famous theory since the days of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. It is based on the idea that the moral worth of an action is determined by its utility, or usefulness, in producing the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. It is an appealing theory, because it is simple and straightforward. It is also very useful in making decisions about how best to allocate resources.

However, there are some problems associated with utilitarianism. One of the most common criticisms is that it can lead to the abuse of power. For example, a government may use utilitarianism to justify policies that benefit the majority at the expense of the minority. This is especially true when it comes to issues of social justice.

Another problem with utilitarianism is that it can be difficult to measure the utility of an action. Bentham himself faced this problem in his utilitarianism. He proposed a system of numerical values to measure the utility of an action, but this system was far from perfect. As a result, his utilitarianism was open to criticism from those who argued that it was too subjective.

Finally, there is the debate between absolute liberalism and relativism when it comes to utilitarianism. Absolute liberalism tends to favor the greatest good for the greatest number, while relativism allows for individual circumstances to be taken into account. Both approaches have their merits, and it is up to the individual to decide which is the most appropriate in a given situation.

When it comes to defending a nation against a violent mass of terrorists, utilitarianism can be a useful tool. It allows for decisions to be made based on the greatest good for the greatest number, which may include killing the terrorists if necessary. However, it is important to remember that utilitarianism should never be used to treat humans merely as a means to an end.