Let me ask you a question. Let's assume that you have a sick family member and the doctors tell you that a certain treatment and medicine is the best option. So you decide to do it. But a year later it turns out that treatment and medicine was discovered to be the cause of death. Are you guilty of killing them?

Question

Ask a Philosopher · Accepted Answer

Let me ask you a question, if you will. What if you had a sick family member and the doctors prescribed the best treatment they knew of, so you decided to do it? But alas, a year later it was discovered that the treatment and medicine were the cause of death? Are you guilty of killing them? It is a difficult question, for which only you can answer.

I suppose one could argue that if you had known the treatment would be fatal, you would not have administered it. But on the other hand, who could have known such a thing? It is not as if you had a crystal ball to see into the future and determine the outcome. So, are you guilty of killing them when you thought you were doing the best thing for them?

The answer, I think, lies in the heart. If you had acted with love and good intentions, then the answer is no. You could not have been guilty of a crime when your heart was pure. However, if you had acted with malice or carelessness, then the answer is yes.

So, let me ask you this: what was your heart telling you when you decided to administer the treatment? Was it telling you to do what was best for your family member, or was it telling you something else? That is the true question, and it is the only one that can give you your answer.